![]() ![]() The Masada has run everything I've put through it so far. occasional stovepipes have occurred for me with 9mm loaded to minor power factor (125gr 1000 FPS). M9 has a stiff recoil spring and prefers hot ammo. Masada has front slide serrations the M9 lacks. M9's slide release is well-placed but relatively tiny compared to Masada's, which is large and easy to activate. Masada's, while a smaller button, is easier to find with your thumb (and it's ambi, so your trigger finger can hit it too). found myself hunting around for it more than once. The M9 has a mag release button that I always felt was too subtle. The trigger weights are comparable on mine, but while the Steyr has a short bit of gritty creep, the Masada has a longer, smoother creep. The M9's trigger reset is very soft, the Masada's more noticeable. The M9's backstrap has a long beavertail overhang that can get uncomfortable with a high grip and extended shooting sessions Masada is more comfortable in that spot, for me. Masada also has the removable backstraps with sides that extend forward about halfway along the sides they're held on with a roll pin. The Masada does, although it could go further up the sides of the grip than it already does (to be perfect). The M9 has almost no useful texturing on the front and backstrap. The Masada has a higher bore axis than the M9 (but what doesn't?) Accuracy and reliability earn an "A" for me. Due to its magwell, mag changes are a little slow. Trigger slap is something to watch out for, maybe it was just my gun, but installing a RDS made that a non-issue.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |